
From project planning, cost estimating, scheduling, and other project control discussions.
Construction activities are often named using a simple combination of a verb and a noun:
Pour Concrete
Install Pipe
Excavate
Place Asphalt
While these names may appear clear to the person who created them, they may not provide enough information for someone else to understand exactly what work is being described.
This becomes particularly important when activities are used for:
An activity name should provide enough information that someone familiar with the project can understand the intended work without having to ask for clarification.
Consider the activity:
Pour Concrete
What does that mean?
It could be:
And each of these could occur in multiple locations.
The problem is not that “Pour Concrete” is wrong.
The problem is that it is incomplete.
A useful activity description should answer four basic questions:
What is being done?
What resource is being used?
What object is being constructed or worked on?
Where is the work taking place?
This provides the basis for the AROW Method.
AROW = Action + Resource + Object + Work Area
AROW describes:
An Action performed using a Resource on an Object within a specific Work Area.
The four components provide a simple framework for describing construction work consistently.
The Action identifies the work being performed.
Examples:
For example:
Pour Concrete
The Action is Pour.
The action should normally be expressed using a clear construction verb.
The Resource identifies the material that becomes part of the Object or gives shape to the Object.
Examples:
For example:
Pour Concrete
The Resource is Concrete.
The Resource should identify the material relevant to the work being performed.
The Object identifies the component receiving the work.
Examples:
For example:
Pour Concrete for Footing
The Object is Footing.
This distinction is important.
Concrete is the Resource.
Footing is the Object.
Rebar is the Resource.
Column is the Object.
Formwork is the Resource.
Wall is the Object.
The Resource becomes part of the Object or gives shape to it.
The Work Area identifies the physical location where the activity occurs.
Unlike the other elements of AROW, the Work Area does not follow one universal hierarchy.
A building project and a highway project identify locations differently.
The AROW method therefore does not prescribe a particular location system.
Instead:
Use the project’s established location system to identify where the work occurs.
The Work Area might be identified using:
Building → Level → Zone → Grid
For example:
Building A, Level 3, Grid B-4
The Work Area might be identified using:
Route → Station → Segment
or:
Structure → Component → Location
For example:
Mainline, Sta. 125+00–130+00
or:
Bridge, Pier 3
The location system could include:
The specific location identifiers will depend on the project.
The location structure changes by project. The requirement to identify the location does not.
Consider the activity:
AROW identifies:
A — Action: Pour
R — Resource: Concrete
O — Object: Footing
W — Work Area: Building A, Level 1, Grid B-4
The activity is now much more informative than:
Pour Concrete
Consider:
AROW identifies:
A — Action: Install
R — Resource: Reinforced Concrete Pipe
O — Object: Storm Drain
W — Work Area: Sta. 125+00–130+00
The same method works even though the project uses a completely different location system.
A — Action: Place
R — Resource: Aggregate Base
O — Object: Pavement
W — Work Area: Mainline Sta. 240+00–250+00
A — Action: Install
R — Resource: Rebar
O — Object: Pier Cap
W — Work Area: Pier 3
A good activity description creates a common understanding of the work.
It helps different members of the project team interpret the activity consistently.
For example:
Estimator
Can better understand what work is being estimated.
Scheduler
Can better understand what work is being sequenced.
Superintendent
Can better understand what work needs to occur.
Foreman
Can better understand what work is being assigned.
Project Manager
Can better understand what work is being tracked.
Field Engineer
Can better understand what work is being documented.
This is particularly important when multiple people are using the same activity list for different purposes.

Consider the activity:
This is better than simply saying:
Install Pipe
But it may still be incomplete.
There could be:
Using AROW, we can make the activity more precise:
Now the activity communicates:
ACTION
Install
RESOURCE
Reinforced Concrete Pipe
OBJECT
Storm Drain
WORK AREA
Sta. 245+00–250+00
Someone reviewing the activity can understand the intended work without needing to search through the drawings or ask the person who created the activity.
Before finalizing a construction activity, ask four questions:
What is being done?
What material is being used?
What component is being constructed or worked on?
Where is the work taking place?
If the activity provides enough information to answer these four questions, it is likely to be much clearer and more useful.
AROW is not a rule for making activity names as long as possible.
It is a framework for making them as specific as necessary.
Not every activity will require the same level of detail.
For example:
Install Rebar for Column
may be sufficient when the work area is already uniquely identified by the schedule structure.
In another situation, you may need:
Install Rebar for Column at Building A, Level 3, Grid B-4
The amount of location information should be driven by the project’s needs.
The objective is always the same:
Provide enough information to uniquely identify the work.
An activity name should do more than describe an action.
It should communicate the work.
The AROW Method provides a simple and consistent way to describe:
What is being done?
What is being used?
What is being constructed or worked on?
Where is the work taking place?
AROW can be applied to both building and heavy civil construction because it does not prescribe how a project must define its location.
A building may use:
Building → Level → Grid
A highway may use:
Route → Station → Segment
A bridge may use:
Structure → Pier → Location
The location system changes.
The goal of an effective activity naming rule.
Describe the Action, Resource, Object, and Work Area so that the activity can be understood without ambiguity.