Case Study: QC Deficiencies in Tunnel Lining Grouting on New York Subway Extension (New York, 2019)
Project Overview
• Name: Second Avenue Subway Extension
• Location: New York City, New York
• Year: 2019
• Project Size: $2.5 billion
• Scope: Tunnel boring machine (TBM) excavation and precast lining installation
• Lead Agencies/Contractors: Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) /
Category of the Issue, Problem, or Challenge
• Quality Control
• Materials
• Structural
Summary of the Issue, Problem, or Challenge
Poor grouting behind tunnel lining segments caused voids, leading to water infiltration and delayed construction due to necessary re-grouting and inspections.
Root Cause Analysis
- Inadequate grout mix design and lack of quality control during mixing.
- Insufficient monitoring of grout injection pressures and volumes.
- Poor coordination between grouting and lining installation crews.
- Lack of comprehensive training for grouting teams on quality standards.
Impacts Due to the Issue, Problem, or Challenge
- Delay of 5 months for re-grouting and quality assurance testing.
- Additional material and labor costs.
- Increased risk of long-term water damage and tunnel integrity issues.
Corrective Actions Taken
- Revised grout mix designs with improved quality testing protocols.
- Implemented real-time monitoring of grout injection parameters.
- Enhanced communication protocols between installation and grouting crews.
- Conducted targeted training on grout quality and injection techniques.
Lessons Learned
- Grout quality and injection control are critical to tunnel stability.
- Real-time monitoring prevents incomplete grout fills.
- Cross-team coordination improves construction quality.
Audit & Prevention: Project Control Questions to Ask on Future Projects to Help Control the Situation
- Are grout mixes tested and monitored consistently?
- Is grout injection pressure and volume tracked in real time?
- Are grouting crews trained and supervised effectively?