Related to Stormwater Drainage Systems
Case Study: Phoenix Airport Storm Drain Interference (2020)
Project Overview
- Name: Sky Harbor Taxiway Extension
- Location: Phoenix, Arizona
- Year: 2020
- Project Size: $220 million
- Scope: Taxiway extension including major stormwater system rerouting
- Lead Agencies/Contractors: Phoenix Aviation Dept. /
Category of the Issue, Problem, or Challenge
- Stormwater Infrastructure
- Utility Coordination
Summary of the Issue, Problem, or Challenge
During excavation for the new stormwater main, crews struck and ruptured an active drainage trunk line that had not been clearly shown in as-built documents, resulting in sediment-laden water flooding the trench and adjacent apron.
Root Cause Analysis
| Factor | Details |
| Incomplete Utility Locates | The existing storm drain was misaligned from utility maps by 5 feet. |
| Lack of Ground-Penetrating Radar (GPR) Use | No GPR was performed prior to trenching. |
| Miscommunication | Design consultant assumed system had been fully decommissioned. |
Impacts Due to the Issue, Problem, or Challenge
- Flooding of adjacent airfield area, delaying paving operations
- Emergency dewatering and trench support mobilization
- Insurance claim and internal review of coordination procedures
Corrective Actions Taken
- Mandatory subsurface utility engineering (SUE) for all storm drain corridors
- Revised utility approval protocols with GPR verification
- Updated stormwater decommissioning documentation process
Lessons Learned
- Storm drainage systems may differ significantly from records
- Major trenching should always be preceded by subsurface verification
- Utility misidentification near storm drains can cause flooding and delays
Case Study: Atlanta Detention Tank Construction Collapse (2018)
Project Overview
- Name: BeltLine Southeast Segment
- Location: Atlanta, Georgia
- Year: 2018
- Project Size: $150 million
- Scope: Urban trail and greenway project with underground stormwater detention infrastructure
- Lead Agencies/Contractors: Atlanta BeltLine Inc. /
Category of the Issue, Problem, or Challenge
- Deep Excavation
- Stormwater Detention
Summary of the Issue, Problem, or Challenge
A precast underground stormwater detention vault collapsed during installation due to lateral pressure from adjacent saturated soils after a series of heavy rains.
Root Cause Analysis
| Factor | Details |
| Saturated Backfill | Vault installed before site dewatering completed. |
| Poor Excavation Support | Shoring was not designed for prolonged wet conditions. |
| Schedule Pressure | Contractor accelerated installation to meet milestone without verifying subgrade. |
Impacts Due to the Issue, Problem, or Challenge
- Collapse damaged installed precast sections and nearby utilities
- Major delay and cost impact to trail opening
- Investigation by city risk management division
Corrective Actions Taken
- Updated shoring and backfill protocols for detention structures
- Required groundwater monitoring for all deep vault sites
- Training on phased installation under wet conditions
Lessons Learned
- Precast detention systems require dry, well-compacted bases
- Wet-weather work demands special precautions for excavation and backfill
- Risk increases when construction speed overtakes drainage site readiness
Case Study: Dallas Subdivision Detention Pond Breach (2022)
Project Overview
- Name: South Dallas Flood Control Improvements
- Location: Dallas, Texas
- Year: 2022
- Project Size: $95 million
- Scope: Regional stormwater detention and neighborhood flood mitigation
- Lead Agencies/Contractors: Dallas Water Utilities /
Category of the Issue, Problem, or Challenge
- Stormwater Detention
- Earthwork
Summary of the Issue, Problem, or Challenge
A newly constructed earthen detention pond experienced a breach during an unexpected rain event. The embankment had not yet been fully compacted and stabilized, and water overtopped the inlet control structure, eroding a slope and causing partial failure.
Root Cause Analysis
| Factor | Details |
| Incomplete Stabilization | Final grading and erosion controls not yet installed. |
| Poor Rain Forecast Coordination | Storm protection measures delayed despite known weather. |
| Temporary Outlet Plugged | Sediment clogged a temporary outfall pipe, causing overtopping. |
Impacts Due to the Issue, Problem, or Challenge
- Adjacent properties flooded during breach
- Rework of pond liner, slope stabilization, and sediment removal
- Additional oversight from FEMA due to partial federal funding
Corrective Actions Taken
- Mandatory pre-storm inspections and pond monitoring
- Emergency action plans required for detention features in progress
- Use of real-time erosion control sensors on critical embankments
Lessons Learned
- Storm events can severely impact incomplete detention systems
- Temporary drainage features must be sized and maintained for active weather
- Final stabilization cannot be deferred near major storm seasons
Case Study: Spokane Culvert Collapse During Fill (2016)
Project Overview
- Name: Highway 195 Widening Project
- Location: Spokane, Washington
- Year: 2016
- Project Size: $73 million
- Scope: Road widening and new storm culvert installations
- Lead Agencies/Contractors: Washington State DOT
Category of the Issue, Problem, or Challenge
- Culvert Installation
- Embankment Fill
Summary of the Issue, Problem, or Challenge
A 48-inch reinforced concrete pipe culvert collapsed during fill operations after being improperly backfilled without adequate lift compaction and with heavy equipment operating directly overhead.
Root Cause Analysis
| Factor | Details |
| Inadequate Backfill Procedures | Improper lift thickness and moisture content control. |
| Early Loading | Fill and compaction equipment operated over the pipe too soon. |
| Design Review Gap | Site-specific installation sequence was not coordinated between design and contractor. |
Impacts Due to the Issue, Problem, or Challenge
- Pipe replacement and realignment caused 4-week delay
- Cost increase due to excavation redo and temporary detours
- DOT updated trench safety and pipe install procedures
Corrective Actions Taken
- Pre-installation training on pipe zone backfill
- Use of lightweight fill materials in early lifts
- Design documents updated with constructability notes for culverts
Lessons Learned
- Culvert protection during fill requires strict adherence to compaction plans
- Heavy loading over buried storm infrastructure must be carefully sequenced
- Communication gaps between designers and crews can lead to structural loss
Case Study: Charlotte Sediment Basin Overflow into Creek (2019)
Project Overview
- Name: I-485 Outer Loop Completion
- Location: Charlotte, North Carolina
- Year: 2019
- Project Size: $290 million
- Scope: New highway loop segment with roadside drainage and environmental controls
- Lead Agencies/Contractors: North Carolina DOT
Category of the Issue, Problem, or Challenge
- Erosion Control
- Stormwater Sediment Management
Summary of the Issue, Problem, or Challenge
A temporary sediment basin failed to capture runoff during a series of construction-phase storms, discharging silt-laden water into a protected creek and violating state environmental permits.
Root Cause Analysis
| Factor | Details |
| Undersized Basin | Runoff volumes were underestimated during early design. |
| Infrequent Maintenance | Sediment basin was at 75% capacity before storm hit. |
| Lack of Redundant Controls | No backup silt fencing or check dams downstream. |
Impacts Due to the Issue, Problem, or Challenge
- Fines from the NC Department of Environmental Quality
- Temporary work stoppage for environmental compliance review
- Increased monitoring frequency for all sediment basins on project
Corrective Actions Taken
- Redesign of sediment basins to larger capacity
- Weekly inspections with mandatory sediment removal thresholds
- Training for erosion control subcontractors on storm forecasting protocols
Lessons Learned
- Sediment basins must be maintained below critical thresholds
- Secondary erosion control systems should be installed during storm seasons
- Runoff volume projections must include margin for construction disturbance
Case Study: Seattle Outfall Pipe Displacement (2017)
Project Overview
- Name: Alaskan Way Viaduct Replacement
- Location: Seattle, Washington
- Year: 2017
- Project Size: $3.3 billion (overall project)
- Scope: Waterfront tunnel construction with multiple stormwater outfall relocations
- Lead Agencies/Contractors: Washington State DOT /
Category of the Issue, Problem, or Challenge
- Stormwater Outfall
- Utility Relocation
Summary of the Issue, Problem, or Challenge
During installation of a large stormwater outfall pipe to the Puget Sound, crews discovered that the pipe alignment shifted due to unstable trench walls and water infiltration during dewatering. The misalignment required re-excavation and realignment.
Root Cause Analysis
| Factor | Details |
| Unstable Excavation | Soil sloughing due to insufficient shoring and groundwater control. |
| Dewatering System Underperformance | Inadequate pumping capacity allowed water infiltration. |
| Scheduling Pressure | Work expedited during heavy rainfall season, increasing risk. |
Impacts Due to the Issue, Problem, or Challenge
- Two-week delay in outfall completion
- Increased costs for additional excavation and pipe replacement
- Risk mitigation reviews implemented for other utility relocations
Corrective Actions Taken
- Enhanced trench support systems including sheet piling
- Upgraded dewatering pumps and monitoring
- Weather-sensitive scheduling policies introduced
Lessons Learned
- Outfall trench stability is critical and requires robust shoring and water management
- Dewatering design must exceed minimum expected infiltration during wet seasons
- Scheduling should avoid high-risk weather periods for critical underground utilities
Case Study: Houston Grading Conflict with Stormwater Swale (2018)
Project Overview
- Name: Grand Parkway Segment D
- Location: Houston, Texas
- Year: 2018
- Project Size: $750 million
- Scope: Highway construction with extensive roadside stormwater swales
- Lead Agencies/Contractors: TxDOT /
Category of the Issue, Problem, or Challenge
- Grading
- Stormwater Conveyance
Summary of the Issue, Problem, or Challenge
During rough grading operations, the planned elevation for a stormwater swale was raised inadvertently due to contractor error, causing water to pond upstream and flooding a neighboring construction zone.
Root Cause Analysis
| Factor | Details |
| Design-Construction Interface | Misinterpretation of grading plans between survey and earthwork teams. |
| Insufficient Field Verification | Lack of intermediate checks on grade elevations during swale construction. |
| Change Management | No formal communication of minor grade changes among disciplines. |
Impacts Due to the Issue, Problem, or Challenge
- Flood damage to adjacent stockpile areas and temporary utilities
- Project delay of 3 weeks to regrade and reconstruct swale
- Increased contractor claims and disputes over responsibility
Corrective Actions Taken
- Implementation of grade verification checkpoints at key milestones
- Cross-disciplinary communication protocols for grading changes
- Use of GPS-controlled equipment for swale grading
Lessons Learned
- Small grading errors can disrupt stormwater conveyance and cause flooding
- Continuous verification during earthwork is essential for critical drainage features
- Clear communication channels reduce risk of undocumented changes
Case Study: Denver Infiltration Basin Underperformance (2019)
Project Overview
- Name: E-470 Tollway Extension
- Location: Denver, Colorado
- Year: 2019
- Project Size: $400 million
- Scope: Tollway extension with multiple infiltration basins to manage stormwater
- Lead Agencies/Contractors: E-470 Public Highway Authority
Category of the Issue, Problem, or Challenge
- Stormwater Infiltration
- Environmental Compliance
Summary of the Issue, Problem, or Challenge
Post-construction testing of infiltration basins revealed poor infiltration rates caused by improper soil amendment and compaction during basin construction, resulting in surface ponding and permit compliance risks.
Root Cause Analysis
| Factor | Details |
| Soil Compaction | Over-compaction of native soils during basin excavation reduced permeability. |
| Inadequate Soil Amendments | Design specified but not implemented per contract documents. |
| Inspection Gaps | Final QA did not include thorough infiltration rate testing. |
Impacts Due to the Issue, Problem, or Challenge
- Required retrofitting of infiltration basins with soil loosening and amendment
- Delay in project closeout and environmental certification
- Additional monitoring imposed by local environmental agency
Corrective Actions Taken
- Revised soil preparation protocols with mandatory testing and verification
- Training for earthwork crews on infiltration system requirements
- Incorporation of independent QA testing before basin acceptance
Lessons Learned
- Infiltration basin effectiveness depends heavily on soil treatment and compaction control
- Design intent must be strictly enforced during earthwork for stormwater systems
- QA processes should include functional performance tests, not just visual inspections