Case Study: Delay from Soil Instability on Seattle Viaduct Replacement (Washington, 2015)
Project Overview
• Name: Alaskan Way Viaduct Replacement
• Location: Seattle, Washington
• Year: 2015
• Project Size: $3.1 billion
• Scope: Replacement of elevated highway with tunnel and surface street improvements
• Lead Agencies/Contractors: Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) /
Category of the Issue, Problem, or Challenge
• Geotechnical
• Project Delay
Summary of the Issue, Problem, or Challenge
Unanticipated soil instability and ground settlement caused delays during tunneling and foundation works.
Root Cause Analysis
- Inadequate Soil Investigations: Initial geotechnical surveys underestimated soil variability and weak zones.
- Design Underestimation: Foundation designs did not fully account for settlement risks.
- Construction Method Limitations: Tunnel boring and excavation techniques struggled with unstable soils.
- Monitoring Delays: Slow detection of soil movement delayed responsive action.
Impacts Due to the Issue, Problem, or Challenge
- Delay of 8 months in tunneling and foundation phases.
- Increased costs due to ground stabilization and design modifications.
- Risk of damage to adjacent structures requiring mitigation.
Corrective Actions Taken
- Expanded soil investigations with deeper and more comprehensive testing.
- Revised foundation and support designs with enhanced soil stabilization methods.
- Implemented real-time ground movement monitoring systems.
- Adapted tunneling methods with slower advance and ground conditioning.
Lessons Learned
- Thorough geotechnical investigation is critical for large underground projects.
- Construction techniques must be adaptable to ground conditions.
- Early detection and monitoring prevent escalation of soil-related issues.
Audit & Prevention: Project Control Questions to Ask on Future Projects to Help Control the Situation
- Are soil investigations sufficient and reflective of site conditions?
- Are monitoring systems in place for ground movement?
- Is there flexibility in construction methods to adapt to soil behavior?