Case Study: QC Breakdown in Bridge Deck Waterproofing on Portland Bridge Project (Oregon, 2016)
Project Overview
• Name: Portland Bridge Replacement
• Location: Portland, Oregon
• Year: 2016
• Project Size: $620 million
• Scope: Replacement of bridge decks with waterproofing membrane installation
• Lead Agencies/Contractors: Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) /
Category of the Issue, Problem, or Challenge
• Quality Control
• Materials
• Structural
Summary of the Issue, Problem, or Challenge
Waterproofing membrane applied with improper surface preparation and inconsistent thickness led to leaks and premature deterioration.
Root Cause Analysis
- Inadequate inspection of surface cleanliness and moisture levels prior to membrane application.
- Lack of standardized application thickness monitoring.
- Insufficient training and supervision of applicators.
- Poor documentation of QC checks during application phases.
Impacts Due to the Issue, Problem, or Challenge
- Delay of 4 months due to membrane removal, surface re-preparation, and re-application.
- Additional costs for materials and labor.
- Increased risk of corrosion and deck damage if uncorrected.
Corrective Actions Taken
- Developed detailed surface preparation and application checklists.
- Introduced non-destructive testing to verify membrane thickness and adhesion.
- Enhanced applicator training and supervision programs.
- Established thorough QC documentation procedures for all membrane work.
Lessons Learned
- Surface preparation is as important as membrane quality.
- Monitoring application consistency ensures long-term performance.
- Training and documentation support better QC outcomes.
Audit & Prevention: Project Control Questions to Ask on Future Projects to Help Control the Situation
- Are surface preparation standards strictly enforced and verified?
- Is membrane thickness monitored and tested?
- Are applicators trained and supervised adequately?