Case Study: San Francisco Bay Bridge East Span Design-Construction Interface Failures (2007)
Project Overview
• Name: San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge East Span Replacement
• Location: San Francisco, California
• Year: 2007
• Project Size: $6.4 billion
• Scope: Construction of a new self-anchored suspension bridge span
• Lead Agencies/Contractors: California DOT (Caltrans) /
Category of the Issue, Problem, or Challenge
• Design
• Structural & Interface Engineering
Summary of the Issue, Problem, or Challenge
During construction, misalignment between designed bridge components and fabricated steel segments required on-site modifications and partial dismantling. Interface issues arose from discrepancies in tolerances and lack of integrated design-construction workflows.
Root Cause Analysis
- Inadequate tolerance specifications for critical connections.
- Poor integration of design and fabrication teams’ models.
- Insufficient mock-ups or prototype testing before large-scale fabrication.
- Limited use of digital tools for interface management.
Impacts Due to the Issue, Problem, or Challenge
• Construction delays of 10 months due to rework and corrective measures.
• Increased costs by over $30 million.
• Strained relations between contractors and design teams.
Corrective Actions Taken
- Revised tolerance criteria with tighter control measures.
- Improved coordination between designers and fabricators using 3D models.
- Conducted full-scale mock-ups and prototype testing before fabrication.
- Adopted advanced digital interface management platforms.
Lessons Learned
- Tolerance specifications must be realistic and strictly enforced.
- Early and continuous coordination between design and fabrication is critical.
- Mock-ups reduce risk of large-scale interface issues.
- Digital interface management tools improve accuracy and reduce errors.
Audit & Prevention: Project Control Questions to Ask on Future Projects to Help Control the Situation
- Are tolerance limits clearly defined and communicated?
- Is there a collaborative workflow between design and fabrication teams?
- Are physical or virtual mock-ups used to validate designs?
- Are advanced interface management tools implemented?