Case Study: San Francisco Central Subway – Design-Build Delivery Complexities (2013)
Project Overview
• Name: Central Subway Project
• Location: San Francisco, California
• Year: 2013
• Project Size: $1.6 billion
• Scope: Construction of a new subway tunnel and stations using Design-Build delivery
• Lead Agencies/Contractors: San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency (SFMTA), Design-Build Contractor JV
Category of the Issue, Problem, or Challenge
• Project Delivery Method
• Design-Build
Summary of the Issue, Problem, or Challenge
Significant construction delays and cost increases occurred due to coordination problems among design-build team members and unforeseen subsurface conditions. Contractual disputes arose over scope changes and risk allocation.
Root Cause Analysis
- Poor integration of design and construction teams early on.
- Unexpected geotechnical challenges requiring design changes.
- Ambiguities in contract regarding risk for subsurface conditions.
- Insufficient collaborative problem-solving mechanisms.
Impacts Due to the Issue, Problem, or Challenge
• Project delays exceeding 8 months.
• Cost overruns over $100 million.
• Contractor claims and prolonged dispute resolution.
Corrective Actions Taken
- Strengthened integrated project delivery coordination protocols.
- Clarified contract language on subsurface risk and scope changes.
- Established joint task forces for rapid issue resolution.
- Increased geotechnical investigation and monitoring efforts.
Lessons Learned
- Early team integration is crucial in Design-Build projects.
- Detailed geotechnical studies prevent costly surprises.
- Clear contract risk allocation improves dispute management.
- Collaborative problem-solving enhances project resilience.
Audit & Prevention: Project Control Questions to Ask on Future Projects to Help Control the Situation
- Are design and construction teams integrated early?
- Are geotechnical risks thoroughly investigated?
- Is contract language clear on subsurface risk?
- Are issue resolution processes collaborative and timely?